
As I was typing a post about my reactions to Obama's State of the Union Address from Wednesday night, I came across an article in the Wall Street Journal about a man, Scott Roeder, who shot and killed an abortion provider, George Tiller, in church last May. Roeder is making headlines again as his trial has been ongoing the past few days. As he admitted cold-heartedly to the murder, he supported himself by saying he was doing it to protect the innocent lives of the "babies" that Tiller was aborting. Roeder is extremely anti-abortion and felt it was only necessary to kill Tiller in order to get his message across. Today, the jury found Roeder guilty of murder, however his sentencing has not been announced as of now.
My first reaction to this story was wow, I never thought the conflict of abortion could lead to a murder like this. I am torn in the abortion debate, as I do not think it is right to just kill fetuses, but I believe these teenage mothers should be given a second chance at a life where they do not need to care for a child at such a young age. In my ethics class, we learned about how each culture believes that there morals are correct because they practice them and they would only do what is good. Other cultures may have different morals and practices, and they too believe that they are doing the right thing. However, it is CRUCIAL to understand that there is no right or wrong, we must respect each culture for what it is worth. Some people believe in abortion, others do not, but that does not mean they are right or wrong. You have to look at something from both angles, and see why a certain group of people feel a certain way about an issue such as abortion. Unfortunately, Roeder did not do this, and acted out unjustly.